A recent decision by the Ontario Superior Court indicates that immigration sponsorships will be "highly relevant" for divorce litigation/proceedings. An article canvassing the decision was written by Cristin Schmitz for the publication "The Lawyer's Weekly" in Vol. 25, No. 33 January 13, 2006 edition. The article noted that a Canadian sponsored his wife's immigration, but 'left' her 15 months after their arranged marriage must pay for her re-education in Canada. The sponsor was ordered to pay his wife $3,200/month until she completes her studies for an undergraduate business degree from Ryerson university. That could amount to 6 years of support (highly unusual for such a brief marriage). Sponsorship agreements bind the sponsor to fulfill certain financial guarantees. In the case of spouses, this agreement's term is 3 years (previously 10 years). The spousal 'award' far exceeds the new spousal support guidelines. The sponsor's consel advised "Family law lawyers would be best to consult with immigration specialists, and would b ebest to create a very fair and reasonable scenario for the relevant spouse before litigating." Perhaps an element of 'fault' was considered by the court (although not mentioned in the decision). This issue is currently being considered by the Supreme Court...
Read more →