Summary: The author attended an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) meeting to determine if a negative residency determination for their client, a septuagenarian, could be overturned without a full hearing. The ADR process is driven by a Minister's counsel, with a Dispute Resolution Officer serving as a facilitator. The MC asks the bulk of the questions and will consider factors such as non-compliance with the residency obligation, ties to Canada, hardship if relief is not granted, and the Best Interests of Children. In this particular case, the MC was experienced and found that the appeal would likely be granted if it proceeded to a full hearing, but after considering credible and corroborative documents and a short discussion with the client's family member, the MC gave his consent and the client was able to avoid a full hearing. I've discussed the ADR process in the past. Last week I attended at an ADR. The purpose of the meeting was to see whether a negative residency determination could be determined in my client's favour without need for a full hearing. My client, a septuagenarian, was unable to comply with the residency obligation set out in s.28 of the IRPA -essentially -other than a... Read more →