With the election behind us, what lies in store for immigration policy? Here’s an overview of the Liberal Party’s immigration platform announced just a few days prior to one of the most consequential elections in memory. This plan and we can emphasize plan is one that touts sustainability, economic growth, and system efficiency, but much of it sounds aspirational. Remember the context: the Liberals’ need to confront challenges from their own policies since the pandemic, which fueled backlogs and strained resources.
Sustainability and Economic Focus
The Liberals aim to balance population growth with infrastructure, housing, and economic capacity:
Reducing temporary workers and international students to under 5% of Canada’s population by 2027 (from 7.3%).
• Stabilizing permanent resident admissions at less than 1% of the population annually, prioritizing economic growth, family reunification, and support for vulnerable groups like human rights defenders and refugees.
• Revitalizing the Global Skills Strategy to attract high-skilled talent, including from the U.S., with—yet again—promises of streamlined foreign credential recognition to support Canadian businesses.
On that last point, let’s be real: politicians have been promising credential recognition for decades, often with little tangible progress.
System Efficiency and Enforcement
The government pledges to improve the immigration process while tightening oversight:
• Digital tools to reduce processing times and backlogs—another oft-repeated promise that’s easier said than done. And the current digital system is rife with errors and issues.
• A credible and fair process for failed claims to reinforce system integrity. Easier said than done.
• Strengthened border security with more resources for screening, tighter visa requirements, and enhanced enforcement against immigration fraud.
• Legal aid for asylum seekers and refugees to ensure timely advice, quicker resolutions, and fewer appeals (generally speaking the more legal resources provided, the more appeals follow).
• Enhanced federal-provincial collaboration for better information sharing on claimant status, removals, and settlement services.
These goals sound noble, but good intentions aren’t enough. Increased refusals of temporary residence applications, both inside and outside Canada, are likely to continue as enforcement ramps up.
Further, it's not easy removing individuals that don’t want to leave. We could see an increase in the undocumented population not a decrease.
The Liberals also face the messy reality of their own post-pandemic policies, which prioritized high immigration levels without adequately addressing housing or service capacity, leading to today’s strained system.
Francophone Immigration Focus
The Liberals are doubling down on supporting Francophone communities in collaboration with Quebec:. They've set a 12% target for Francophone immigration outside Quebec by 2029, a 20% increase from current levels.
This Francophone focus feels like a niche priority. While cultural preservation is important, it may divert resources from other streams, potentially reducing opportunities for those with established ties to Canada—like those who’ve already lived, worked, or studied here. It’s a choice that could frustrate more than it fulfills.
Citizenship by Descent: A Looming Complication
Pending legislation on citizenship by descent would extend eligibility beyond the first generation, granting automatic citizenship to those born abroad to Canadian parents, regardless of the other parent’s nationality. This could significantly disrupt immigration planning.
Take Elon Musk, a Canadian citizen through his mother, Maye Musk. Under this proposed law, all of his children—regardless of their mothers’ nationalities—would be entitled to Canadian citizenship. With Musk’s multiple children, and potentially tens of thousands of others in the U.S. alone, we could see a flood of new citizenship claims. This risks overwhelming a system already strained by post-pandemic backlogs, further complicating the Liberals’ goal of capping immigration levels. Unintended consequences, like processing delays or resource shortages, seem inevitable. As the saying goes, “Man plans, and God laughs.”
External Challenges
The Liberals face significant external pressures. The Trump administration’s policies on migrants—legal or otherwise—could reignite the Safe Third Country Agreement controversy, putting Canada’s asylum system and border management under strain. Combined with the domestic fallout from their own post-pandemic immigration policies, the Liberals have a steep hill to climb.
Conclusion
The Liberal government’s immigration strategy outlines sustainability and economic growth, but much of it feels aspirational—credential recognition being a prime example of a promise we’ve heard before.
Beyond the aspirational tone, it's not a radical shift -basically we are returning to intake levels that we saw for many years prior to the Trudeau decade. PR numbers were about 1% under Chretien, Martin and Harper.
Now, it's also clear that the Liberals must tackle the mess of their own making since the pandemic, including backlogs and infrastructure strain, while navigating new challenges like the Francophone focus, increased refusals of temporary residence applications, and a potential influx of citizens by descent. Add in external pressures from the Trump administration, and the road ahead looks daunting. Applicants and stakeholders should approach this plan with cautious realism and seek professional guidance to navigate the uncertainties.
Comments