Today's hearing, where my client and I navigated the intense and often microscopic questioning from a member, was a reminder of the challenges refugee claimants face, even in cases that appear prima facie strong. My client, an LGBTQ+ individual fearing return to a repressive country, was subjected to a level of scrutiny that may have felt overwhelming for her; I was not overwhelmed but certainly put off given the development in the jurisprudence and the Board's own policies in this regard. The hearing started off with a deep dive in terms of a delay in making the claim. Decision makers continue to make assumptions about how people "should" respond to fear and danger. Hilary Evans Cameron, a former classmate of mine at Osgoode Hall, has deeply examined this issue in her research. She points out that adjudicators often assume that those who fear for their lives will behave in predictable ways—fleeing immediately, seeking protection in the first safe country they reach, and never returning to their homeland. But as Cameron's work makes clear, these assumptions are not based on evidence; rather, they ignore decades of research across disciplines like psychology, sociology, and anthropology, which show that human responses to danger... Read more →